Show simple item record

Successful coordination through culture? Domination myths in early modern times and the organizational culture thesis
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorEwert, Ulf Christiande
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-26T15:06:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:30:38Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:30:38Z
dc.date.issued1998de
dc.identifier.issn0172-6404
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/3182
dc.description.abstractHerrschaftsmythen können als spezifische Gestaltungselemente einer Organisationskultur interpretiert werden. Sie waren in den frühneuzeitlichen Systemen Mittel des politischen Zusammenwirkens, gerichtet auf Integration und Definition der jeweiligen Organisation. Gegenstand der Untersuchung sind neun frühneuzeitliche Mythen, darunter der Roi Soleil, Neues Israel und Wilhelm Tell. Hinterfragt wurden wahrgenommene Ähnlichkeiten zwischen den neun Mythen, deren integrative und revolutionäre Muster sowie die unterschiedlichen Grade der Integration und Definition innerhalb der verwandten politischen Systeme. Tatsächlich bestätigen sich durch die Befragung die Auffassungen, dass das sehr integrative Muster eines Mythos und sein hoher Grad kollektiver Orientierung mit einem republikanischen politischen Kontext korrespondieren. Hauptsächlich das integrative Muster führte zu signifikanten Wirkungen der politischen Integration. (prh)de
dc.description.abstract'Creating a myth was an often used and seemingly successful strategy of early modern sovereigns and power-bearing social elites to legitimate their claim on government and to establish a mechanism, which created collective identity. Through myths, the sovereign's predestination to rule could have probably been communicated in an easy and understandable manner. Viewing early modern political systems as organizations, the organizational-culture-approach shows, that myths of power have been specific appearences of organizational culture and explains, that they worked as means of political coordination, raising both integration and definition of the organization. In order to get some quantitative information about the characteristics of nine early modern myths of power and their respective effects, the instrument of expert interrogation was tested. Undergraduate students with specific knowledge in early modern myths and their political context were asked to evaluate within a structured questionnaire their pairwise perceived similarity between myths, the degrees of collective orientation, revolutionary and integrative design of the myths and the degrees of integration and definition within the affiliated political systems. This data was used to construct a graphical representation of myths via multidimensional scaling and to test the impact of mythological characteristics on degrees of integration and definition of the respective political systems. Following the experts' perceptions, it was both the very integrative design of a myth and its high degree of collective orientation, which corresponded with a republican political context. But it was mainly the integrative design, that yielded significant effects on political integration.' (author's abstract)en
dc.languagedede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.titleErfolgreiche Koordination durch Kultur? Herrschaftsmythen der Frühen Neuzeit und die Organizational-Culture-Thesede
dc.title.alternativeSuccessful coordination through culture? Domination myths in early modern times and the organizational culture thesisen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalHistorical Social Researchde
dc.source.volume23de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozKultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologiede
dc.subject.classozEthnologie, Kulturanthropologie, Ethnosoziologiede
dc.subject.classozCultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literatureen
dc.subject.classozEthnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociologyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitisches Systemde
dc.subject.thesozKollektivbewusstseinde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical integrationen
dc.subject.thesozmythen
dc.subject.thesozmythologyen
dc.subject.thesozMythosde
dc.subject.thesozevaluationen
dc.subject.thesozElitede
dc.subject.thesozMythologiede
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Integrationde
dc.subject.thesozeliteen
dc.subject.thesozorganizational cultureen
dc.subject.thesozEntwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozdevelopmenten
dc.subject.thesozpolitical influenceen
dc.subject.thesozpolitical systemen
dc.subject.thesozHerrschaftssicherungde
dc.subject.thesozmodern timesen
dc.subject.thesozOrganisationskulturde
dc.subject.thesozcollective consciousnessen
dc.subject.thesozNeuzeitde
dc.subject.thesozguarantee of dominationen
dc.subject.thesozBewertungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Einflussde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-31822de
dc.date.modified2008-11-26T15:06:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10053214
internal.identifier.thesoz10052838
internal.identifier.thesoz10041597
internal.identifier.thesoz10036171
internal.identifier.thesoz10040669
internal.identifier.thesoz10039215
internal.identifier.thesoz10042898
internal.identifier.thesoz10038467
internal.identifier.thesoz10052835
internal.identifier.thesoz10046565
internal.identifier.thesoz10060811
internal.identifier.thesoz10036415
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo58-89
internal.identifier.classoz10216
internal.identifier.classoz10400
internal.identifier.journal152de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.23.1998.3.58-89
dc.subject.methodsempirischde
dc.subject.methodsGrundlagenforschungde
dc.subject.methodswissenschaftstheoretischde
dc.subject.methodshistoricalen
dc.subject.methodsempirisch-qualitativde
dc.subject.methodsempiricalen
dc.subject.methodshistorischde
dc.subject.methodsbasic researchen
dc.subject.methodsepistemologicalen
dc.subject.methodsqualitative empiricalen
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.methods5
internal.identifier.methods17
internal.identifier.methods4
internal.identifier.methods9
internal.identifier.methods8
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record