Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorUskul, Ayse K.de
dc.contributor.authorSherman, David K.de
dc.contributor.authorFitzgibbon, Johnde
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-14T02:57:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T23:02:28Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T23:02:28Z
dc.date.issued2009de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/29207
dc.description.abstractThe present study contributes a cultural analysis to the literature on the persuasive effects of matching message frame to individuals’ motivational orientations. One experiment examines how members of cultural groups that are likely to differ in their regulatory focus respond to health messages focusing on either the benefits of flossing or the costs of not flossing. White British participants, who had a stronger promotion focus, were more persuaded by the gain-framed message, whereas East-Asian participants, who had a stronger prevention focus, were more persuaded by the loss-framed message. This cultural difference in persuasion was mediated by an interaction between individuals’ self-regulatory focus and type of health message. Thus health messages framed to be culturally congruent led participants to have more positive attitudes and stronger intentions to perform the health behaviors, and the interaction between self-regulatory focus and message frame emerged as the pathway through which the observed cultural difference occurs. Discussion focuses on the integration of individual difference, socio-cultural, and situational factors into models of health persuasion.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.otherculture; regulatory focus; gain- and loss-framed messages; congruency effect
dc.titleThe cultural congruency effect: culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messagesen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Experimental Social Psychologyde
dc.source.volume45de
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-292076de
dc.date.modified2012-04-16T10:19:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo535-541
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.journal199de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.005de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record