Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMehrotra, Santoshde
dc.contributor.authorDelamonica, Enriquede
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01T06:13:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:26:06Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:26:06Z
dc.date.issued2005de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22953
dc.description.abstractOne of the most significant developments in the 1990s in social policy in developing and transition countries has been the growth of privatization in health, education and water services – three basic services, which involve most of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Welfare pluralism was very much a core element of the Washington Consensus. Despite the talk of the Washington Consensus being 'dead for years', the international financial institutions have pushed for welfare pluralism in social services since the 1990s. This article critically scrutinizes the arguments and evidence that have been made in favour of greater private sector participation in these services. The article addresses what role the private sector could or should play in these services and is, thus, driven by practical policy concerns. For reasons of space, this article does not address the non-profit or nongovernmental organization (NGO) provision of basic social services (which, in most countries, is quite small in size).en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherglobal education policy; global health policy; global water policy; privatization; Washington Consensus
dc.titleThe Private Sector and Privatization in Social Services: Is the Washington Consensus 'Dead'?en
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalGlobal Social Policyde
dc.source.volume5de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozEntwicklungsländersoziologie, Entwicklungssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.classozSocial Policyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozSociology of Developing Countries, Developmental Sociologyen
dc.subject.classozSozialpolitikde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-229532de
dc.date.modified2011-10-18T15:09:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo141-174
internal.identifier.classoz11000
internal.identifier.classoz10211
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal144de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1468018105053677de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record