Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHille, Peterde
dc.contributor.authorKnill, Christophde
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01T06:06:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:43:38Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:43:38Z
dc.date.issued2006de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22910
dc.description.abstractThe Central and East European (CEE) countries that had applied for membership in the European Union were confronted with far-reaching requirements in order to bring domestic policies in line with EU standards. Notwithstanding these rather uniform pressures emerging from conditionality, there is considerable variety in alignment performance across the candidate countries and over time. To account for this, we use time series cross-sectional data on the implementation performance of 13 EU candidate countries between 1999 and 2003. Our results indicate that the bureaucratic strength and effectiveness of a country positively influence its ability to adjust domestic arrangements to EU requirements. By contrast, we find no support for veto-player theories of political constraints on legislative change. We hence conclude that the implementation of the acquis communautaire in candidate countries prior to accession has been a question of bureaucratic problems rather than of political veto-manoeuvres.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherEuropeanization; policy change; transformation countries;
dc.title‘It’s the Bureaucracy, Stupid’: the implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU candidate countries; 1999-2003en
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Union Politicsde
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozEuropapolitikde
dc.subject.classozEuropean Politicsen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.thesozImplementationde
dc.subject.thesozimplementationen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-229100de
dc.date.modified2011-06-15T12:59:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10047087
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo531-552
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz10506
internal.identifier.journal126de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1465116506069442de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record