Volltext herunterladen
(305.6 KB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-228897
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Expert Interviews
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract Testing the reliability of experts should be a key element of expert interviews. Using the Condorcet Jury Theorem, it is shown that expert reliability can provide an indication of the validity of expert-opinion data. The theoretical framework is applied to expert-interview data collected in the Dome... mehr
Testing the reliability of experts should be a key element of expert interviews. Using the Condorcet Jury Theorem, it is shown that expert reliability can provide an indication of the validity of expert-opinion data. The theoretical framework is applied to expert-interview data collected in the Domestic Structures and European Integration (DOSEI) project. Special attention is paid to the role of ‘leading’ experts and salient issues. Evaluating the DOSEI data, the main findings are that (i) with some exceptions, there are acceptable levels of inter-expert agreement, (ii) whether the leading expert is included or not does not make a large difference to expert agreement, and (iii) experts are more in agreement on salient issues.... weniger
Klassifikation
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
Europapolitik
Freie Schlagwörter
Condorcet Jury Theorem; European Constitution; expert interviews; inter-coder agreement; reliability; saliency of issues;
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2005
Seitenangabe
S. 315-337
Zeitschriftentitel
European Union Politics, 6 (2005) 3
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116505054835
Status
Postprint; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz
PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)