Bibtex export

 

@article{ Stilgoe2007,
 title = {The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile                phone health risks},
 author = {Stilgoe, Jack},
 journal = {Public Understanding of Science},
 number = {1},
 pages = {45-61},
 volume = {16},
 year = {2007},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506059262},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224034},
 abstract = {UK scientific advice on the possible health risks of mobile phones has embraced (or                seems to be embracing) broader engagement with interested non-experts. This paper                explains the context of lost credibility that made such a development necessary, and                the implications of greater engagement for the construction (and expert control) of                “public concern.” I narrate how scientific advice matured from                an approach based on compliance with guidelines to a style of “public                science” in which issues such as trust and democracy were intertwined with                scientific risk assessment. This paper develops existing conceptions of the                “public understanding of science” with an explanation based                around the co-production of scientific and social order. Using a narrative drawn                from a series of in-depth interviews with scientists and policymakers, I explain how                expert reformulation of the state of scientific uncertainty within a public                controversy reveals constructions of “The Public,” and the                desired extent of their engagement. Constructions of the public changed at the same                time as a construction of uncertainty as solely an expert concern was molded into a                state of politically workable public uncertainty. This paper demonstrates how                publics can be constructed as instruments of credible policymaking, and suggests the                potential for public alienation if non-experts feel they have not been fairly represented.},
}