Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKolip, Petrade
dc.contributor.authorBüchter, Rolandde
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-11T04:00:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T23:13:30Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T23:13:30Z
dc.date.issued2009de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/20337
dc.description.abstractAims: We investigated the involvement of first-time mothers, who had a planned Caesarean section, in the decision to have a Caesarean section, taking into account their different educational levels. Subjects and methods: A self-assessment questionnaire was sent in July 2005 to women who had undergone a Caesarean section in 2004. Participants were 2,685 members of a statutory health insurance fund who had given birth by Caesarean section (response rate: 48.0%). Included were primiparae with planned Caesarean section (n = 352). Results: The women in this cross-sectional study felt well informed about the procedure of a section but not its consequences. They used several sources of information and were most satisfied with the information provided by doctors and midwives. Of the women in this study 20% did not have a midwife. No major differences were observed between different educational levels. Conclusion: Although most women were satisfied with their decision, they felt that they did not receive enough information about the consequences of a Caesarean section. This information need could be met by a further involvement of midwives in maternity care.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcMedicine and healthen
dc.subject.ddcMedizin und Gesundheitde
dc.subject.otherCaesarean section; Shared decision-making; Information needs; Birth
dc.titleInvolvement of first-time mothers with different levels of education in the decision-making for their delivery by a planned Caesarean section: women's satisfaction with information given by gynaecologists and midwivesen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Public Healthde
dc.source.volume17de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozMedizin, Sozialmedizinde
dc.subject.classozHealth Policyen
dc.subject.classozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozMedicine, Social Medicineen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-203375de
dc.date.modified2010-11-16T09:12:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo273-280
internal.identifier.classoz50100
internal.identifier.classoz11006
internal.identifier.journal203de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc610
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-008-0246-1de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record