Show simple item record

Der Afrikanische Peer Review Mechanismus (APRM) als Mittel zur Verbesserung von Governance? Erfahrungen in Ghana
[research report]

dc.contributor.authorGrimm, Svende
dc.contributor.authorNawrath, Kristinde
dc.contributor.authorRoth, Robertde
dc.contributor.authorTriebel, Simonde
dc.contributor.authorUtz, Brittade
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-14T11:52:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:43:16Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2009de
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-88985-481-0de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/19371
dc.description.abstract"The quality of governance in Africa is particularly in discussion since the end of the Cold War. In 2002, African states created the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) with the declared goal to improve governance on the continent. Around half of Africa's states have agreed on conducting a self-assessment and discuss this with other heads of state and government. Ghana was the front runner in this process. As the first county to undergo an APRM, Ghana applied and also shaped the rules of the APRM. The aim of this study, which is the final report of a working group conducted in Ghana, is to look into the experience with the APRM in Ghana. Research was based on numerous interviews with stakeholders in the Ghanaian APRM, namely government officials, the national APRM secretariat, non-state actors and representatives of civil society. The study assesses the potential impact of the APRM on governance by considering the rigour or flexibility of its legal framework, the openness to participation in the self-assessment of Ghana, and the quality of the Ghanaian APRM report. It also takes a first look into whether recommendations of the report were implemented. From this analysis, the study assesses the APRM's potential for improving governance in Ghana and provides recommendations for APRM stakeholders and donors." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.titleThe African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) as a Tool to Improve Governance? Experience in Ghanaen
dc.title.alternativeDer Afrikanische Peer Review Mechanismus (APRM) als Mittel zur Verbesserung von Governance? Erfahrungen in Ghanade
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.die-gdi.de/CMS-Homepage/openwebcms3.nsf/(ynDK_contentByKey)/ANES-7UFMUU/$FILE/Studies%2045.2009.pdfde
dc.source.volume45de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBonnde
dc.source.seriesDIE Studiesde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.thesozbürgerschaftliches Engagementde
dc.subject.thesozcivil societyen
dc.subject.thesozEnglish-speaking Africaen
dc.subject.thesozErfahrungde
dc.subject.thesozAfrika südlich der Saharade
dc.subject.thesozAfricaen
dc.subject.thesozGhanaen
dc.subject.thesozinternationales Abkommende
dc.subject.thesozinstrumentsen
dc.subject.thesozanglophones Afrikade
dc.subject.thesozAfrikade
dc.subject.thesozWest Africaen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Partizipationde
dc.subject.thesozpurposeen
dc.subject.thesozGhanade
dc.subject.thesozgovernanceen
dc.subject.thesozGovernancede
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Institutionde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical participationen
dc.subject.thesozinternational agreementen
dc.subject.thesozEntwicklungslandde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical institutionen
dc.subject.thesozZivilgesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozcitizens' involvementen
dc.subject.thesozZielsetzungde
dc.subject.thesozWestafrikade
dc.subject.thesozAfrica South of the Saharaen
dc.subject.thesozdeveloping countryen
dc.subject.thesozInstrumentariumde
dc.subject.thesozexperienceen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-193715de
dc.date.modified2011-03-14T13:21:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.greylittde
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionUSB Kölnde
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10039889
internal.identifier.thesoz10047603
internal.identifier.thesoz10034685
internal.identifier.thesoz10043629
internal.identifier.thesoz10034677
internal.identifier.thesoz10034610
internal.identifier.thesoz10034679
internal.identifier.thesoz10054194
internal.identifier.thesoz10035649
internal.identifier.thesoz10035143
internal.identifier.thesoz10034678
internal.identifier.thesoz10054891
internal.identifier.thesoz10034390
internal.identifier.thesoz10047619
internal.identifier.thesoz10041513
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentresearch reporten
dc.type.documentForschungsberichtde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo182
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.document12
dc.contributor.corporateeditorDeutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik gGmbHde
internal.identifier.corporateeditor79de
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.subject.methodsempirisch-qualitativde
dc.subject.methodsqualitative empiricalen
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.methods5
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.series143de
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record