Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSturm, Heikede
dc.contributor.authorBogner, Franz X.de
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-01T04:21:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:57:50Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:57:50Z
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13235
dc.description.abstractThe study investigated cognitive and motivational effects of two educational interventions, a conventional versus a student-oriented approach. We monitored the impact on the cognitive achievement outcome and the motivation of students. Both approaches dealt with the subject of birds and bird flight; the student-oriented approach consisted of a unit based on workstations, the conventional one was taught in a more teacher-centred manner. 326 secondary school pupils of the highest stratification level participated in this study. By using a pre-, post- and retention-test design, both approaches were evaluated with the same empirical batteries (by applying a cognitive item set and the 'Intrinsic Motivation Inventory'). The conventional approach provided higher achievement scores whereas the student-oriented approach showed a higher motivational rating. Comparing the student-oriented approach with and without introduction, the group with introduction attained higher achievement scores. The results are discussed in terms of general expectations about the cognitive outcome in open learning environments and self-determination theory. Educational implications are drawn concerning the implementation of learning at workstations in school curricula.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddcBildung und Erziehungde
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcEducationen
dc.subject.otherbiology education; learning environment; learning at workstations; student-oriented; teacher-centred
dc.titleStudent-oriented vesus teacher-centred: the effect of learning at workstations about birds and bird flight on cognitive achievement and motivationen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Science Educationde
dc.source.volume30de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue7de
dc.subject.classozAllgemeine Psychologiede
dc.subject.classozLehrende, Erziehende, Lernendede
dc.subject.classozGeneral Psychologyen
dc.subject.classozTeachers, Students, Pupilsen
dc.subject.classozUnterricht, Didaktikde
dc.subject.classozCurriculum, Teaching, Didacticsen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-132355de
dc.date.modified2010-09-01T16:19:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo941-959
internal.identifier.classoz10614
internal.identifier.classoz10703
internal.identifier.classoz10615
internal.identifier.journal171de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc370
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701313995de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record