Endnote export

 

%T Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization
%A Huber, Joseph
%J Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
%N 4
%P 28
%V 2
%D 2000
%= 2010-07-21T11:12:00Z
%~ USB Köln
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-121610
%U http://www.soziologie.uni-halle.de/huber/docs/towards.pdf
%X "This paper deals with core aspects of ecological modernization, and how these have
been received in the debate on sustainable development during the Rio process particularly
by two social milieus, one being industry and business, the other milieu representing
the red-green current of the ecology movement, which at the Rio conference in
1992 was part of the group of non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
The NGOs' understanding of sustainable development has been formulated by themselves
as an anti-industrial and anti-modernist strategy of "sufficiency", meaning selflimitation
of material needs combined with "industrial disarmament", withdrawal from
free world market economy and an egalitarian distribution of the remaining scarce resources.
Contrary to that, the industry’s understanding of sustainable development is the
'efficiency-revolution". Industry and business are looking for a strategy that would
allow for further economic growth and ecological adaptation of industrial production at
the same time. The means for achieving this goal is seen in the introduction of
environmental management systems aimed at improving the environmental
performance, i.e. improving the efficient use of material and energy, thus increasing
resource productivity in addition to labour and capital productivity.
There are good reasons for both sufficiency and efficiency. Nevertheless I will argue
that both strategies do have important shortcomings, so that even if combined they will
not yet represent a sustainable answer to the ecological challenge. In order to open up a
truely sustainable development path an additional third kind of transformational strategy
needs to be pursued. In the present name-giving context one can call it the strategy of
"consistency". A term with a similar meaning in the current discussion is "industrial
ecology" (Socolow et al. 1994, Ayres&Ayres 1996). Industrial ecology aims at an industrial
metabolism that is consistent with nature's metabolism. The transformation of traditional
industrial structures, which are environmentally often unadapted, to an ecologically
modernized consistent industrial metabolism implies major or basic technological
innovations, not just incremental efficiency-increasing change and minor modifications
of existing product-chains.The content of this contribution can be seen as a piece of policy design. It is of conceptual
nature, i.e. it is not mere theoretical analysis, nor is it a report on empirical
research work. It should be stressed, however, that things discussed here were not
worked out by voluntaristic "scenario-writing", but closely correspond to empirical,
practical and historical knowledge." (Textauszug)
%C GBR
%G en
%9 journal article
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info