SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9374

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television

[journal article]

Abbott, Traci B.

Abstract

This essay addresses the rise in sexual and gender-fluid characters in scripted US television targeting the Gen Z audience (born 1997-2012), based on their moniker as the "queerest" generation, with over 20% of younger US and international respondents identifying as LGBTQ in polls, the majority as s... view more

This essay addresses the rise in sexual and gender-fluid characters in scripted US television targeting the Gen Z audience (born 1997-2012), based on their moniker as the "queerest" generation, with over 20% of younger US and international respondents identifying as LGBTQ in polls, the majority as sexually fluid (bi/pansexual) or non-binary (genderfluid/genderqueer). By analyzing six series (2019-2023) marketed as "authentically" Gen Z, I argue this shift invests in Gen Z's "hip" attitude towards such fluidity the same way Caldwell argues that 1990's diversification of the televisual audience produced a "programming agenda…that cultivates and rewards distinction in ethnic, racial, and class terms" (2020, p. 376). Caldwell's (2020) theory of boutique programming, described as "a selective, signature world where artistic sensitivity went hand in hand with social relevance and viewer discrimination" (p. 164), exposes how these recent series rely on "visual flourishes…and narrative embellishments" (p. 377) but move beyond cinematic techniques by combining palatial settings and extravagant lifestyles with shockingly explicit sexual situations. Caldwell's (2020, p. 377) assertion that "stardom and gossip defeat the dramatic obligation or need for narrative coherence" is reflected in the 21st century's reliance on social media promotions with hypersexual imagery and expensive designer outfits for its high school-age characters and an entertainment media which highlights their "edgy," "sexy," "explicit," and "provocative" content. Therefore, I argue that, like Caldwell, we should avoid "overestimat[ing] the political value" (2020, p. 376) of these presentations when these non-binary identities are shown as inaccessible, depoliticized, and hypersexualized, which maintains rather than challenges entrenched binary ideals of gender and sexuality.... view less

Keywords
television; gender; bisexuality; television series; United States of America; diversity; sexuality

Classification
Broadcasting, Telecommunication
Media Contents, Content Analysis

Free Keywords
American television; non-binary; Gen Z; LGBTQ; televisuality; teen series

Document language
English

Publication Year
2025

Journal
Media and Communication, 13 (2025)

Issue topic
Redefining Televisuality: Programmes, Practices, and Methods

ISSN
2183-2439

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.