Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGummer, Tobiasde
dc.contributor.authorBach, Ruben L.de
dc.contributor.authorDaikeler, Jessicade
dc.contributor.authorEckman, Stephaniede
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-02T11:26:53Z
dc.date.available2023-01-02T11:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/83682
dc.description.abstractResponse probabilities are used in adaptive and responsive survey designs to guide data collection efforts, often with the goal of diversifying the sample composition. However, if response probabilities are also correlated with measurement error, this approach could introduce bias into survey data. This study analyzes the relationship between response probabilities and data quality in grid questions. Drawing on data from the probability-based GESIS panel, we found low propensity cases to more frequently produce item nonresponse and nondifferentiated answers than high propensity cases. However, this effect was observed only among long-time respondents, not among those who joined more recently. We caution that using adaptive or responsive techniques may increase measurement error while reducing the risk of nonresponse bias.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherresponse propensity; measurement error; panel survey; adaptive survey design; ZA5665: GESIS Panel - Standard Edition (Data file Version 43.0.0)de
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Response Probabilities and Data Quality in Grid Questionsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume15de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozprobabilityen
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozerroren
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozpanelen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozPanelde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozFehlerde
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozWahrscheinlichkeitde
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-83682-6
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10061922
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10054018
internal.identifier.thesoz10043384
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo65-77de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2021.v15i1.7727de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.description.miscFDBde
dc.subject.classhort10100de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record