Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorBirke Daniels, Kristinade
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Pinzón, Vivianade
dc.contributor.authorKurtenbach, Sabinede
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T13:09:10Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T13:09:10Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1862-3573de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/81477
dc.description.abstractColombia elected a new progressive government on 19 June. While the COVID-19 pandemic did not play a direct role in the campaign, it has deepened both structural problems as well as pre-pandemic trends such as high levels of social inequality, citizen distrust regarding state institutions, and increasing violence in certain regions of the country. While these social disparities led to a call for change by different groups, reducing violence will be a key policy test for the new government. COVID-19 hit Colombia at a delicate time. A comprehensive peace agreement had been signed in 2016, but the elections of 2018 brought the forces that had run on an anti-agreement platform into government. A half-hearted implementation of the accord resulted, which together with increasing citizen dissatisfaction led to mass protests at the end of 2019. In the wake of the pandemic's onset, around six million Colombians fell into poverty. Despite some social policies such as the solidarity income (ingreso solidario), in many fields the state retreated from the provision of public services - in contrast with an increase in repressive measures, as for instance in the pursuit of coca eradication. After a short decrease in collective forms of violence due to lockdown policies, pre-pandemic patterns resumed. In peripheral and border zones, armed actors strategically leveraged the pandemic to increase their control over illicit enterprises and local populations. The entanglement of deteriorating socio-economic conditions, increasing violence, and an extremely unpopular government opened the door to the election of the first left-leaning president in Colombia's history, Gustavo Petro. The new government offers the historic opportunity to save the peace agreement and initiate the profound changes Colombia desperately needs. External actors need to support the reform agenda. Particularly, the implementation of the structural changes established in the peace agreement as well as reform of the country's security institutions. While the latter are ignored in the peace accord, doing so is a necessary condition to promote trust in the state and to contain violence by means other than repression. In addition, new economic policies for greater social inclusion and the mitigation of climate change are urgent topics on the agenda too.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19; Pandemiede
dc.titlePandemic, Protest, and Petro Presidente: Rescuing Colombia's Peacede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Lateinamerika
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozKolumbiende
dc.subject.thesozColombiaen
dc.subject.thesozInnenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozdomestic policyen
dc.subject.thesozWahlkampfde
dc.subject.thesozelection campaignen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozRegierungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozgovernment policyen
dc.subject.thesozPolitikverdrossenheitde
dc.subject.thesozdissatisfaction with politicsen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Ungleichheitde
dc.subject.thesozsocial inequalityen
dc.subject.thesozstrukturelle Gewaltde
dc.subject.thesozstructural violenceen
dc.subject.thesozInterdependenzde
dc.subject.thesozinterdependenceen
dc.subject.thesozVerflechtungde
dc.subject.thesozinterconnectionen
dc.subject.thesozLateinamerikade
dc.subject.thesozLatin Americaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-81477-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035560
internal.identifier.thesoz10047493
internal.identifier.thesoz10061878
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10056321
internal.identifier.thesoz10053247
internal.identifier.thesoz10038124
internal.identifier.thesoz10045590
internal.identifier.thesoz10047710
internal.identifier.thesoz10047867
internal.identifier.thesoz10035406
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo14de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGerman Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Lateinamerika-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor1215
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.57671/gfla-22032de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series287
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record