Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBartolomé-Peral, Edurnede
dc.contributor.authorCoromina, Lluisde
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T13:12:03Z
dc.date.available2022-06-10T13:12:03Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2336-128Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/79554
dc.description.abstractFundamental aspects of human existence such as birth and death are at the core of our values and profoundly sensitive to our religious beliefs, our ideals as a society, and our opinions on the extent to which individuals may interfere in these basic life issues. This article analyses the factors that explain people's attitudes towards key beginning- and end-of-life issues. To do this, we first tracked variations across two points in time, and then looked at the effects of value orientations and socio-demographic factors in comparative perspective across countries. Based on previous literature, we consider justification for euthanasia, abortion, and in vitro fertilisation as a latent variable using European Value Study data from the 2008 and 2017 waves. Five European societies were analysed: Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, and Russia. All the countries observed showed growing levels of justification for these practices, although significant differences were found in the value orientation effects and respondents´ background variables on attitudes towards life and death issues. In order to properly address comparability, multi-group confirmatory factor analyses across countries and across waves were conducted, and measurement invariance tested. From our analyses, we can conclude that age and religiosity, alongside other sociodemographic variables, are important explanatory factors in the justification of life and death issues in all the countries examined; however, value orientations show less conclusive effects on such attitudes.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.otherin-vitro fertilisation; EVS 2008; EVS 2017de
dc.titleAttitudes towards Life and Death in Europe: a Comparative Analysisde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review
dc.source.volume56de
dc.publisher.countryCZEde
dc.source.issue6de
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.thesozEVSde
dc.subject.thesozEVSen
dc.subject.thesozSterbende
dc.subject.thesozdyingen
dc.subject.thesozEuthanasiede
dc.subject.thesozeuthanasiaen
dc.subject.thesozSchwangerschaftsabbruchde
dc.subject.thesozabortionen
dc.subject.thesozWertde
dc.subject.thesozvalueen
dc.subject.thesozEuropade
dc.subject.thesozEuropeen
dc.subject.thesozGeburtde
dc.subject.thesozbirthen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.subject.thesozWertorientierungde
dc.subject.thesozvalue-orientationen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocial factorsen
dc.subject.thesozdemographische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozdemographic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozkünstliche Befruchtungde
dc.subject.thesozartificial inseminationen
dc.subject.thesozSpaniende
dc.subject.thesozSpainen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozNiederlandede
dc.subject.thesozNetherlandsen
dc.subject.thesozTschechische Republikde
dc.subject.thesozCzech Republicen
dc.subject.thesozRusslandde
dc.subject.thesozRussiaen
dc.subject.thesozLebende
dc.subject.thesozlifeen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-79554-0
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10079761
internal.identifier.thesoz10059255
internal.identifier.thesoz10042952
internal.identifier.thesoz10034508
internal.identifier.thesoz10046043
internal.identifier.thesoz10042879
internal.identifier.thesoz10044666
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
internal.identifier.thesoz10053899
internal.identifier.thesoz10045241
internal.identifier.thesoz10040663
internal.identifier.thesoz10063432
internal.identifier.thesoz10058646
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10053256
internal.identifier.thesoz10064243
internal.identifier.thesoz10057012
internal.identifier.thesoz10066121
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo835-862de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc100
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2020.052de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record