SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(392.9Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53699-6

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Central catheter of peripherally insertion in neonates: integrative literature review

Cateter central de inserção periférica em neonato: revisão integrativa da literatura
Catéter central de inserción periférica en el neonato: revision integrativa de la literatura
[journal article]

Rangel, Regiane Josy Mediote
Castro, Denise Silveira de
Primo, Cândida Caniçali
Zandonade, Eliana
Christoffel, Marialda Moreira
Amorim, Maria Helena Costa

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the evidence published on the practices of the use of Peripheral Inserted Central Venous Catheter (PICC) in newborns. Method: Integrative review researching the databases LILACS, MEDLINE, and COCHRANE, from 2008 to 2012. Results: Forty one articles were selected and ranked by ... view more

Objective: To evaluate the evidence published on the practices of the use of Peripheral Inserted Central Venous Catheter (PICC) in newborns. Method: Integrative review researching the databases LILACS, MEDLINE, and COCHRANE, from 2008 to 2012. Results: Forty one articles were selected and ranked by evidence level: 4,9% level one; 9,8% level two; 31,7% level three; 34,2% level four; 17% level five; and 2,4% level six. These articles were grouped into the categories: general complications; blood flow infection related to catheter; utilization description and insertion of practices and maintenance. Conclusion: The evidence highlighted the importance of the permanent education for the insertion, maintenance and application of new technologies, in order to minimize the unwanted effects of the use of PICC. It was noted that there is a lack of national production of studies that showed strong evidence levels.... view less

Keywords
baby; new technology; intensive care medicine; medical care; baby care; hospital

Classification
Medical Sociology

Document language
English

Publication Year
2016

Page/Pages
p. 5193-5202

Journal
Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online, 8 (2016) 4

DOI
https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2016.v8i4.5193-5202

ISSN
2175-5361

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.