SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(686.8Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52154-9

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Археология фундаментального онто-гносеологического обмана

Archeology of fundamental onto-epistemological deception
[journal article]

Ezri, Grigoriy Konstantinovich

Abstract

This article discusses the historical and philosophical forms of the existence of the fundamental onto-epistemological deception, in other words, archaeological exposition genealogy prospects fundamental onto-epistemological deception. The article related the "disintegration" of being and the "decon... view more

This article discusses the historical and philosophical forms of the existence of the fundamental onto-epistemological deception, in other words, archaeological exposition genealogy prospects fundamental onto-epistemological deception. The article related the "disintegration" of being and the "deconstruction" of metaphysics with the elimination of transcendentas something that is outside the subject-object relationship. Outside of the subject-object relationship was placed nothing, and being became nothing in next time. There are based on this think make conclusion about the dissolution of human in discourse and breakup of social role from a human. There are briefly shows the history of the relation of text and reality. There are tried to present postmodern philosophy in classical terms, near to the Hegelian. This explication helped define the concept of "simulacrum" through the concept of «thing (ens)" (ontic definition). Simulacrum is thing (ens) that cannot go out of possibility into reality due to the collapse of being, but differs by Difference like thing into unbeing. Such thing (ens) is false in nature, as there is no being (being is the truth). During the presentation there is a comparison of classical and post-modern philosophy.... view less


В данной статье рассматриваются историко-философские формы существования фундаментального онто-гносеологического обмана, иначе говоря, археологическое изложение генеалогической перспективы фундаментального онто-гносеологического обмана. В статье связываются «распад» бытия и «деконструкция» м... view more

В данной статье рассматриваются историко-философские формы существования фундаментального онто-гносеологического обмана, иначе говоря, археологическое изложение генеалогической перспективы фундаментального онто-гносеологического обмана. В статье связываются «распад» бытия и «деконструкция» метафизики с ликвидацией трансцендентного как нечто, находящегося за пределами субъект-объектного отношения. На основе этого делается вывод о растворении человека в дискурсе и отрыве социальной роли от человека. Кратко показывается история соотношения текста и реальности. Сделана попытка представить постмодернистскую философию в классических терминах, близких к гегельянским. Данная экспликация позволила дать определение концепту «симулякр» через понятие «сущее» (онтическое определение). По ходу изложения происходит сравнение классической и постмодернистской философии.... view less

Classification
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion

Free Keywords
being; potential; reality; rhizome-fold

Document language
Russian

Publication Year
2016

Page/Pages
11 p.

Journal
Nauka - rastudent.ru., 33 (2016)

ISSN
2311-8814

Status
Published Version; reviewed

Licence
Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.