More documents from Levinger, Matthew
More documents from Politics and Governance

Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

A Core National Security Interest: Framing Atrocities Prevention

[journal article]

Levinger, Matthew

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:

Further Details
Abstract This essay analyzes President Barack Obama's communication strategies in his speeches and presidential statements concerning threats of mass atrocities in Libya, Syria, and Iraq from 2011 through 2015. It examines how he has used three rhetorical "frames" to explain events in these countries and to advocate specific U.S. policy responses: the "legalistic" (or "liberal internationalist"), the "moralistic," and the "security" frame. Obama utilized primarily the legalistic frame to justify U.S. military intervention in Libya in 2011, and he relied mainly on the security frame (focusing on terrorist threats against U.S. nationals) to justify the deployment of U.S. military forces against ISIL in Iraq and Syria in 2014-2015. Obama's rhetorical framing of the violence perpetrated by the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad since 2011 has been less consistent. Hardly ever in these speeches did Obama suggest that mass atrocities per se constituted a threat to U.S. national security - despite the declaration in Obama's 2011 Presidential Study Directive on Mass Atrocities that "preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest" of the United States. Utilizing an approach to linguistic analysis developed by Roman Jakobson, the paper shows how Obama has employed rhetorical devices that emphasize the boundaries between the "in-group" of the American national community and the "outgroups" in other countries who are threatened by mass atrocities. Because members of an in-group are typically depicted as warranting greater concern than members of out-groups, Obama's assignment of victimized communities to out-group status has effectively justified inaction by the U.S. government in the face of genocidal violence. (author's abstract)
Keywords Libya; Iraq; Syria; United States of America; Obama, B.; genocide; massacre; civil war; military conflict; foreign policy; security policy; national identity; national security; pressure-group politics; military intervention; humanitarian intervention; political intervention; discourse analysis
Classification Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture; Peace and Conflict Research, International Conflicts, Security Policy; International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy
Document language English
Publication Year 2015
Page/Pages p. 26-43
Journal Politics and Governance, 3 (2015) 4
Issue topic Mass Atrocity Prevention (Part II)
ISSN 2183-2463
Status Published Version; peer reviewed
Licence Creative Commons - Attribution