SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150352

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Literature reviews: generative and transformative textual conversations

Literatur-Reviews als generative und transformative Konversation
Revisión documental: conversaciones textuales generativas y transformadoras
[journal article]

Walker, Sharon

Abstract

The intention of this article is to invite readers to explore and understand how literature reviews can be conducted from a systemic and dialogical approach. After reading a paper by Montuori (2005), I considered how literature reviews could be situated systemically whereby connections and relatedne... view more

The intention of this article is to invite readers to explore and understand how literature reviews can be conducted from a systemic and dialogical approach. After reading a paper by Montuori (2005), I considered how literature reviews could be situated systemically whereby connections and relatedness between people and ideas are identified. This opened up possibilities for me that were transformative, re-positioning a process that I had previously seen as positivist, to one which is connected to a systemic position (Barge, 2006). In this article, I discuss how I conduct literature reviews from a systemic position; each text speaking to the others as in conversation, identifying themes, connections and generating new knowledge. The concept of texts "speaking" to each other lends itself to a dialogical approach. I will discuss how the systemic, dialogical and ethical considerations should be made. (author's abstract)... view less


Hauptintention dieses Beitrages ist es, Lesende zu einem Verständnis von Literatur-Reviews aus einer systemischen und dialogischen Perspektive einzuladen: Angeregt durch die Lektüre eines Beitrags von Montuori (2005) beschäftigte ich mich damit, wie solche Reviews situiert und wie Bezüge zwischen Me... view more

Hauptintention dieses Beitrages ist es, Lesende zu einem Verständnis von Literatur-Reviews aus einer systemischen und dialogischen Perspektive einzuladen: Angeregt durch die Lektüre eines Beitrags von Montuori (2005) beschäftigte ich mich damit, wie solche Reviews situiert und wie Bezüge zwischen Menschen und Ideen hergestellt werden könnten. Transformative Potenziale erschlossen sich mir, indem ich einen Prozess, den ich zuvor positivistisch gedacht hatte, systemisch re-positionierte (Barge 2006). In diesem Beitrag zeige ich, wie ich Literatur-Reviews aus einer solchen systemischen Perspektive durchführe: Die Texte "sprechen" miteinander wie in einem Gespräch, neue Themen und Bezüge werden identifiziert und es entsteht neues Wissen. Das Konzept "sprechender" Texte entlehne ich einem dialogischen Ansatz, und ich diskutiere, welche systemischen, dialogischen und ethischen Aspekte beachtet werden sollten. (Autorenmreferat)... view less

Keywords
research approach; knowledge production

Classification
Research Design

Free Keywords
Literatur-Review; systemische Positionierung; systemische Praxis; systemisches Denken

Document language
English

Publication Year
2015

Page/Pages
13 p.

Journal
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16 (2015) 3

ISSN
1438-5627

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.