Bookmark and Share

Foreign policy think tanks in China and Japan: characteristics, current profile, and the case of collective self-defence


Abb, Pascal; Köllner, Patrick


Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-454176

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract The role of foreign policy think tanks (FPTTs) in policy-making has received substantial scholarly attention, with most studies focusing on US-based organizations. In this article, we seek to address this spatial bias by discussing the development and roles of FPTTs in two East Asian countries, China and Japan. China today hosts the second-largest think tank scene in the world, and many FPTTs have received influxes of funding and increased the academic qualifications of their staffers in recent years. Japan also hosts a sizable array of think tanks, but many of them operate on a for-profit basis and do not focus on public policy issues; Japan has very few genuine FPTTs. In both countries, FPTTs are in many ways linked to the government. While they seek to inform and influence foreign and security policy as well as public discourse on international affairs, they usually do not act as agenda setters. By examining the recent case of constitutional reinterpretation in Japan, which aimed to enable collective self-defence, we show how Japanese public intellectuals, including think tankers, helped to legitimize this controversial move and how Chinese FPTTs reacted publicly by providing media commentary in support of the official government line.
Thesaurusschlagwörter foreign policy; think tank; China; Japan; political influence; decision making process; bilateral relations; international relations; political decision; political consulting; Far East
Klassifikation internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik
Freie Schlagwörter collective self-defence
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2015
Seitenangabe 593–612 S.
Zeitschriftentitel International journal : Canada's journal of global policy analysis, 70 (2015) 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020702015592119
ISSN 0020-7020
Status Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung
Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.