Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Can monetary valuation undermine nature conservation? Evidence from a decision experiment

[working paper]

Rode, Julian; Le Menestrel, Marc; Cornelissen, Gert

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(174 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-450640

Further Details
Corporate Editor Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung - UFZ
Abstract Nature conservation scientists and practitioners have voiced the concern that a conservation discourse based on economic arguments and monetary valuation may undermine conservation efforts by eroding (“crowding out”) the influence of other arguments for nature conservation. This paper presents the results of a decision experiment in which nature conservation is framed using an economic, a non-economic, or a combined discourse before participants take hypothetical decisions on the construction of hydropower dams in the Bolivian Amazon. We find that an economic discourse with monetary valuation framing leads to significantly fewer pro-conservation decisions, that is, decisions against dam construction. This is the case when a cost-benefit analysis inclusive of environmental costs reveals that the dam is economically viable (i.e., there remains a trade-off between economics and conservation), but also when such a costs-benefit analysis indicates that the dam is not viable (i.e., no trade-off). The results suggest that an economic discourse with monetary valuation framing can indeed undermine nature conservation efforts. They also suggest that the effect can be avoided, however, by presenting non-economic arguments side by side with an economic rationale.
Keywords conservation; economic development (on national level); conflict potential; discourse; cost-benefit analysis; ecological consequences; sustainable development
Classification Ecology, Environment
Free Keywords framing; monetary valuation; crowding out
Document language English
Publication Year 2015
City Leipzig
Page/Pages 14 p.
Series UFZ Discussion Papers, 9/2015
ISSN 1436-140X
Status Published Version
Licence Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike