Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCernat, Alexandrude
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T11:01:03Z
dc.date.available2015-10-07T11:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44924
dc.description.abstract"Mixed mode designs are receiving increased interest as a possible solution for saving costs in panel surveys, although the lasting effects on data quality are unknown. To better understand the effects of mixed mode designs on panel data we will examine its impact on random and systematic error and on estimates of change. The SF12, a health scale, in the Understanding Society Innovation Panel is used for the analysis. Results indicate that only one variable out of 12 has systematic differences due to the mixed mode design. Also, four of the 12 items overestimate variance of change in time in the mixed mode design. We conclude that using a mixed mode approach leads to minor measurement differences but it can result in the overestimation of individual change compared to a single mode design." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleImpact of mode design on measurement errors and estimates of individual changede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozPanelde
dc.subject.thesozpanelen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozErhebungsmethodede
dc.subject.thesozdata collection methoden
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozFehlerde
dc.subject.thesozerroren
dc.subject.thesozSchätzungde
dc.subject.thesozestimationen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10054018
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10037921
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
internal.identifier.thesoz10043384
internal.identifier.thesoz10057146
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo83-99de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i2.5851de
dc.subject.methodsGrundlagenforschungde
dc.subject.methodsbasic researchen
dc.subject.methodsMethodenentwicklungde
dc.subject.methodsdevelopment of methodsen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.methods8
internal.identifier.methods11
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record