Mehr von Fürtig, Henner
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Übernahme per Copy & Paste
Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export
Weiterempfehlen
The Nuclear Agreement with Iran: Successful Settling of an International Crisis
Der Atomvertrag mit Iran: erfolgreiche Beilegung einer internationalen Krise
[Arbeitspapier]
Fürtig, Henner
Volltext herunterladen
(437 KByte)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445166
Weitere Angaben:
| Körperschaftlicher Herausgeber | GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien |
| Abstract | On 14 July 2015, after intense and controversial negotiations, delegates of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the European Union, and Germany, on the one side, and Iran, on the other, signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in Vienna - thereby settling a 12-year-long international crisis. The JCPOA signatures represent multiple victories: a triumph of international diplomacy in a region, which mostly attracts attention through violent conflicts; a triumph for the United Nations and the UNSC, who have rarely reached consensus; a victory for the European Union and Germany, who demonstrated their ability to participate in global conflict resolution; and a victory for the United States and its president, who was able to resolve a long-lasting crisis in the Middle East without using military force. It was also a victory for Iran, which can now hope to end its international isolation and prosper. With all due respect, however, these are no grounds for euphoria. The agreement will only enter into force after being ratified by the signatory states; in the US Congress, in particular, tough opposition is looming. While the JCPOA may have improved conditions for resolving other conflicts in the Middle East, it is no panacea. Given the complex nature of upheavals in the region, to suggest otherwise would be akin to Francis Fukuyama’s premature claim that the end of the Cold War represented the "end of history." Israel and the Gulf States are highly sceptical of the treaty. For Israel, it signals international legitimation of Iran’s nuclear programme; for the heads of state on the Arabian Peninsula, it implies a preference for Iran in the contest for regional dominance. More moderate and reform-minded forces may actually be strengthened in Iran. However, the state and regime are unlikely to undergo a radical change of character. The system that emerged from the revolution has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to adapt and assimilate. |
| Thesaurusschlagwörter | Iran; UNO; EU; UN Security Council; international agreement; nuclear weapon; nuclear energy; conflict management; United States of America; Israel; international relations |
| Klassifikation | Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitik; internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik |
| Freie Schlagwörter | nuclear treaty |
| Sprache Dokument | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr | 2015 |
| Erscheinungsort | Hambuirg |
| Seitenangabe | 8 S. |
| Schriftenreihe | GIGA Focus International Edition, 6 |
| ISSN | 2196-3940 |
| Status | Veröffentlichungsversion; nicht begutachtet |
| Lizenz | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung |
