More documents from Fürtig, Henner

Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

The Nuclear Agreement with Iran: Successful Settling of an International Crisis

Der Atomvertrag mit Iran: erfolgreiche Beilegung einer internationalen Krise
[working paper]

Fürtig, Henner

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(437 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:

Further Details
Corporate Editor GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien
Abstract On 14 July 2015, after intense and controversial negotiations, delegates of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the European Union, and Germany, on the one side, and Iran, on the other, signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in Vienna - thereby settling a 12-year-long international crisis. The JCPOA signatures represent multiple victories: a triumph of international diplomacy in a region, which mostly attracts attention through violent conflicts; a triumph for the United Nations and the UNSC, who have rarely reached consensus; a victory for the European Union and Germany, who demonstrated their ability to participate in global conflict resolution; and a victory for the United States and its president, who was able to resolve a long-lasting crisis in the Middle East without using military force. It was also a victory for Iran, which can now hope to end its international isolation and prosper. With all due respect, however, these are no grounds for euphoria. The agreement will only enter into force after being ratified by the signatory states; in the US Congress, in particular, tough opposition is looming. While the JCPOA may have improved conditions for resolving other conflicts in the Middle East, it is no panacea. Given the complex nature of upheavals in the region, to suggest otherwise would be akin to Francis Fukuyama’s premature claim that the end of the Cold War represented the "end of history." Israel and the Gulf States are highly sceptical of the treaty. For Israel, it signals international legitimation of Iran’s nuclear programme; for the heads of state on the Arabian Peninsula, it implies a preference for Iran in the contest for regional dominance. More moderate and reform-minded forces may actually be strengthened in Iran. However, the state and regime are unlikely to undergo a radical change of character. The system that emerged from the revolution has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to adapt and assimilate.
Keywords Iran; UNO; EU; UN Security Council; international agreement; nuclear weapon; nuclear energy; conflict management; United States of America; Israel; international relations
Classification Peace and Conflict Research, International Conflicts, Security Policy; International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy
Free Keywords nuclear treaty
Document language English
Publication Year 2015
City Hambuirg
Page/Pages 8 p.
Series GIGA Focus International Edition, 6
ISSN 2196-3940
Status Published Version; not reviewed
Licence Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications