Bibtex export

 

@article{ Mikucka2013,
 title = {Employed or inactive? Cross-national differences in coding parental leave beneficiaries in European labour force survey data},
 author = {Mikucka, Malgorzata and Valentova, Marie},
 journal = {Survey Research Methods},
 number = {3},
 pages = {169-179},
 volume = {7},
 year = {2013},
 issn = {1864-3361},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2013.v7i3.5308},
 abstract = {"In survey research the parental leave beneficiaries are usually coded as either employed or inactive. An exception is the European Labor Force Survey (EU-LFS), which includes parental leave among other forms of being employed but temporarily not working. This paper explores classification of parental leave takers in EU-LFS. The authors show that classification rules differ cross-nationally: in some countries parental leave takers are considered inactive, in others - employed but temporarily not working. In particular in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary and Slovakia the EU-LFS data classify the beneficiaries as inactive. The authors estimate the number of mothers on parental leave in these countries and show that EU-LFS employment rates of women aged 18-40 are biased downwards 2-7 percentage points; for mothers of children aged 0-2 the bias reaches 12-45 percentage points. Their study shows the limited comparability of EU-LFS employment rates and warns about possible bias in cross-national studies." (author's abstract)},
 keywords = {parental leave; classification; Elternurlaub; Erwerbsbeteiligung; internationaler Vergleich; Klassifikation; labor force participation; international comparison; Mutterschaftsurlaub; error; maternity leave; Fehler}}