Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

The impact of survey and response modes on current smoking prevalence estimates using TUS-CPS: 1992-2003

Die Auswirkung von Umfrage- und Antwortmodi auf laufende Raucher-Prävalenzschätzungen bei Verwendung von TUS-CPS (Umfragemodi): 1992-2003
[journal article]

Soulakova, Julia; Davis, William W.; Hartmann, Anne; Gibson, James

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2009.v3i3.2118

Further Details
Abstract "This study identified whether survey administration mode (telephone or in-person) and respondent type (self or proxy) result in discrepant prevalence of current smoking in the adult U.S. population, while controlling for key sociodemographic characteristics and longitudinal changes of smoking prevalence over the 11-year period from 1992-2003. The authors used a multiple logistic regression analysis with replicate weights to model the current smoking status logit as a function of a number of covariates. The final model included individual- and family-level sociodemographic characteristics, survey attributes, and multiple two-way interactions of survey mode and respondent type with other covariates. The respondent type is a significant predictor of current smoking prevalence and the magnitude of the difference depends on the age, sex, and education of the person whose smoking status is being reported. Furthermore, the survey mode has significant interactions with survey year, sex, and age. The authors conclude that using an overall unadjusted estimate of the current smoking prevalence may result in underestimating the current smoking rate when conducting proxy or telephone interviews especially for some sub-populations, such as young adults. They propose that estimates could be improved if more detailed information regarding the respondent type and survey administration mode characteristics were considered in addition to commonly used survey year and sociodemographic characteristics. This information is critical given that future surveillance is moving toward more complex designs. Thus, adjustment of estimates should be contemplated when comparing current smoking prevalence results within a given survey series with major changes in methodology over time and between different surveys using various modes and respondent types." (author's abstract)
Keywords United States of America; smoking; estimation; demographic factors; social factors; age; gender-specific factors; ethnic group; man; woman; regression analysis; young adult; telephone interview; survey; comparison of methods; design; health; damage to one's health; North America
Classification Research Design; Health Policy
Document language English
Publication Year 2009
Page/Pages p. 123-137
Journal Survey Research Methods, 3 (2009) 3
Status Published Version; peer reviewed
Licence Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications