Bibtex export

 

@article{ Henry2009,
 title = {Comparing sampling and estimation strategies in establishment populations},
 author = {Henry, Kimberly A. and Valliant, Richard},
 journal = {Survey Research Methods},
 number = {1},
 pages = {27-44},
 volume = {3},
 year = {2009},
 issn = {1864-3361},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2009.v3i1.72},
 abstract = {"Population structure is a key determinant of the efficiency of sampling plans and estimators. Variables in many establishment populations have structures that can be described by simple linear models with a single auxiliary variable and a variance related to some power of that auxiliary. If a working model can be devised that is a good approximation to the population structure, then very efficient sample designs and estimators are possible. This study compares alternative strategies of a) selecting a pilot study to estimate the variance power and using that estimate to select a main sample and b) selecting a only main sample based on an educated guess about the variance power. The authors also examine a number of sampling plans, including probability proportional to size, deep stratification based on a measure of size, and weighted balanced sampling. Population totals are estimated by best linear unbiased predictors, general regression estimators, and some other choices often used in practice." (author's abstract)},
 keywords = {theory-practice; design; sample; probability; Methodenforschung; population; Design; Schätzung; Methode; method; Theorie-Praxis; demographical structure; strategy; Stichprobe; Strategie; Bevölkerung; Bevölkerungsstruktur; estimation; Wahrscheinlichkeit; methodological research}}