Bibtex export

 

@book{ Gawel2014,
 title = {Article 9 Water Framework Directive - what does the term "water services" mean? On the EU Court of Justice conclusions of Advocate General Jääskinen in case C-525/12},
 author = {Gawel, Erik},
 year = {2014},
 series = {UFZ Discussion Papers},
 pages = {9},
 volume = {20/2014},
 address = {Leipzig},
 publisher = {Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung - UFZ},
 issn = {1436-140X},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-408304},
 abstract = {The conclusions of Advocate General Jääskinen in the matter of the infringement proceedings
against Germany, regarding the scope of the term “water services” in Article 9 of the Water
Framework Directive, are now available. In these he considers that the action brought by the
Commission against the narrow interpretation in Germany, which is restricted to water supply
and waste water disposal, is inadmissible due to the fact that there is no complaint in respect
of any clearly defined conduct that would constitute an infringement; in the alternative
he materially agrees in full with the position put forward by Germany. However, this paper
argues that the AG’s main arguments in favour of a strict interpretation are misleading.},
 keywords = {Wasserwirtschaft; water management; Abwasser; sewage; EU; EU; Richtlinie; directive; Umweltrecht; environmental law; Umweltpolitik; environmental policy; Kostendeckung; cost recovery; Rechtsauslegung; interpretation of the law; Europäischer Gerichtshof; European Court of Justice; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Federal Republic of Germany}}