Weiterempfehlen

Bookmark and Share


The judgment-choice discrepancy: Non-compatibility or restructuring?

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Montgomery, Henry; Selart, Marcus; Gärling, Tommy; Lindberg, Erik

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-399402

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract The study examines the relative merits of a noncompatibility and a restructuring explanation of the recurrent empirical finding that a prominent attribute looms larger in choices than in judgments. Pairs of equally attractive options were presented to 72 undergraduates who were assigned to six conditions in which they performed (1) only preference judgments or choices, (2) preference judgments or choices preceded by judgments of attractiveness of attribute levels, or (3) preference judgments or choices accompanied by think-aloud reports. The results replicated the prominence effect for choices, but a prominence effect was also found for preference judgments. In accordance with the restructuring explanation, the think-aloud protocols indicated that options were more often restructured in choices than in preference judgments. However, restructuring could not explain the prominence effect observed for preference judgments. A modified compatibility hypothesis is offered as an alternative explanation.
Thesaurusschlagwörter decision making; information process; decision making criterion; judgment formation; information; selection; interaction pattern; action orientation
Klassifikation Allgemeine Psychologie; Sozialpsychologie
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 1994
Seitenangabe 145–155 S.
Zeitschriftentitel Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7 (1994) 2
ISSN 0894-3257
Status Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen
top