More documents from Pänke, Julian

Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Moving beyond the normative-geopolitical ambiguity of the EU's imperial politics in the neighbourhood: the case of Lebanon

[working paper]

Pänke, Julian

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(639 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:

Further Details
Corporate Editor Institut für Europäische Politik e.V. (IEP)
Abstract Since 2005, the European Union intensified its political commitment in Lebanon. The same year an Association Agreement was signed and the first Action Plan published in 2007. The Arab Uprisings of 2011 – and on its coat-tails the brutal war in Syria – fortified an enduring imperative of stability. Over the last years, the EU became more realistic in its ambitions – more assertive in its claims for influence, and demonstrated a greater capacity to play to its political strengths. An increasing realism was obscured by prevalent normative discourses reflected in EU documents. A particular normativegeopolitical ambiguity in its external relations is caused by the imperial nature of the EU. This paper argues that Brussels operates in legacies of imperial rule in its efforts to stabilize and transform the Near East. The first chapter of the paper conceptualizes the EU’s imperial politics. The second section analyzes contents of the bilateral agenda, as formulated in the Action Plan, which can be compared with 19th century ‘standards of civilization’ developed by European states; whereas the stabilization policies resemble geopolitical concepts. The third chapter examines the current role of the EU in Lebanon, especially in light of the “three M-approach” introduced by the revised ENP of Spring 2011 and beyond “three M” addressing security issues. Despite its successes, the Union still remains an underestimated actor in the Levant. This is the case mainly because the ENP suffers from its normativegeopolitical ambiguity, demanding at the same time a geopolitically motivated stabilization of the peripheries (in terms of power) and a sustainable transformation of the neighbourhood converging with the value system of the EU (in terms of norms).
Keywords EU; neughborhood policy; foreign policy; international relations; bilateral relations; geopolitics; Lebanon; Arab countries; Middle East; stabilization; security policy; cooperation
Classification European Politics; International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy
Document language English
Publication Year 2014
City Berlin
Page/Pages 19 p.
Series IEP Policy Papers on Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 4
Status Published Version; reviewed
Licence Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works