Endnote export

 

%T Restrictions and their anomalies: the third forum and the regulation of religion in Tibet
%A Barnett, Robert
%J Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
%N 4
%P 45-107
%V 41
%D 2012
%K Chen Kuiyuan; Third Forum; anomalies
%@ 1868-4874
%~ GIGA
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-5751
%U http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/575
%X In 1994, at a meeting known as the Third Forum on Tibet Work, the Chinese authorities
      announced a series of restrictions on religious practice in the Tibetan Autonomous
      Region. Described by many outsiders in terms of abuses of rights, in fact those measures
      differed in important ways. By analysing the target, rationale and procedure of these
      restrictions, it becomes clear that some were relatively routine, while others were
      anomalous – their purpose was not explained by officials, the source of their authority
      was not clear, or the restrictions were simply not admitted to at all. These anomalous
      orders can be linked to major changes in underlying discourses of modernization and
      development among officials in Tibet at the time. They reflected undeclared shifts
      in attitudes to religion and cultural difference, and seeded the dramatic worsening
      in state–society relations that has taken place in Tibetan areas since that time.
%C DEU
%G en
%9 Zeitschriftenartikel
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info