More documents from Bryant, Antony
More documents from Historical Social Research, Supplement

Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

A constructive/ist response to Glaser's "Constructivist Grounded Theory?"

[journal article]

Bryant, Antony

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(558 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:

Further Details
Abstract "Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent contribution to the GTM literature, CHARMAZ distinguished between objectivist GTM and constructivist GTM. This drew a response from Barney GLASER. What follows is a rejoinder to GLASER, offering some clarification of developments in people's understanding of this important and widely-used qualitative approach." (author's abstract)
Keywords grounded theory; qualitative method; research approach; constructivism
Classification Research Design
Document language English
Publication Year 2007
Page/Pages p. 106-113
Journal Historical Social Research, Supplement (2007) 19
Status Published Version; peer reviewed
Licence Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works