Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Understanding the influence of outcome valence in bargaining : a study on fairness accessibility, norms, and behavior

[journal article]

Leliveld, Marijke C.; Beest, Ilja van; Dijk, Eric van; Tenbrunsel, Ann E.

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(326 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-285533

Further Details
Abstract "In this study we investigate how outcome valence affects the importance of self-interest and fairness in ultimatum bargaining. In three experiments we systematically study the effect of outcome valence on fairness accessibility, norms, and behavior. Results on all three aspects show strong evidence for the hypothesis that fairness becomes more important and self-interest becomes less important in negative valence bargaining. Fairness accessibility was higher when bargaining involved negative payoffs than when it involved positive payoffs (Experiment 1), the fairness norm was stronger in negatively versus positively valenced bargaining when an identical unequal offer benefiting the allocators was evaluated (Experiment 2), and allocators allocated more to recipients in negative valence bargaining than in positive valence bargaining (Experiment 3). We relate our findings to insights derived from the do-no-harm principle." [author's abstract]
Classification General Sociology, Basic Research, General Concepts and History of Sociology, Sociological Theories; Social Psychology
Free Keywords outcome valence; bargaining; do-no-harm; norms; fairness accessibility
Document language English
Publication Year 2009
Page/Pages p. 505-514
Journal Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (2009) 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.006
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)