Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

When and how communicated guilt affects contributions in public good dilemmas

[journal article]

Wubben, Maarten J.J.; Cremer, David de; Dijk, Eric van

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(331 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-277551

Further Details
Abstract "Two laboratory studies investigated how groups may deal with the strong emotions that social dilemmas often elicit. A first study showed that a new group member evaluated guilt communicated by a fellow group member as more instrumental than neutral emotion feedback when the amount of required resources to obtain the public good (i.e., provision point) was perceived as difficult to obtain. A second study revealed that participants use communicated guilt to draw inferences about both past and future contributions from all fellow group members. Participants also contributed more themselves and adhered to equality more often when guilt versus no emotion was communicated, but only when the provision point was high. Expected contributions from fellow group members mediated this effect." [author's abstract]
Classification Social Psychology
Free Keywords Provision point; Guilt; Communicated emotion; Public good dilemma
Document language English
Publication Year 2008
Page/Pages p. 15-23
Journal Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (2008) 1
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.015
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)