Bibtex export

 

@article{ Prooijen2008,
 title = {The egocentric nature of procedural justice: social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures},
 author = {Prooijen, Jan-Willem van and Cremer, David de and Beest, Ilja van and Ståhl, Tomas and Dijke, Marius van and Lange, Paul A. M. van},
 journal = {Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
 number = {5},
 pages = {1303-1315},
 volume = {44},
 year = {2008},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-262881},
 abstract = {In four studies, the authors investigated the individual-oriented versus social-oriented nature of procedural justice effects by comparing fairness-based responses to decision-making procedures among proself versus prosocial oriented individuals. In Studies 1 through 3, we measured participants' social value orientation and manipulated whether or not they were granted or denied voice in a decision-making process. Results consistently revealed that the effects of voice versus no-voice on fairness-based perceptions, emotions, and behavioral intentions were significantly more pronounced for individuals with proself orientations than for individuals with prosocial orientations. These findings were extended in Study 4, a field study in which perceived procedural justice was a stronger predictor of satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors among proselfs than among prosocials. These findings suggest that procedural justice effects can be accounted for by self-oriented motives or needs, rather than prosocial motives that are often conceptualized as being associated with justice.},
}