Endnote export

 

%T Comparative politics of strategic voting: a hierarchy of electoral systems
%A Gschwend, Thomas
%P 30
%D 2006
%= 2011-09-06T16:58:00Z
%~ USB Köln
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-257715
%U http://www.sowi.uni-mannheim.de/gschwend/pdf/papers/gschwend-midwest06.pdf
%X "What is the impact of electoral rules on the way people make decisions in the voting booth? Institutional incentives moderate a voter’s expectation formation process and, therefore, make the frequency of strategic voters predictable across a wide range of electoral systems. I provide evidence that there is a latent dimension of propensity to cast a strategic vote following the wasted-vote logic on which various seat-allocation systems can be placed even controlling for district magnitude. Thus the variance of vote-to-seat conversion mechanisms is far more important in determining the level of strategic voting across electoral systems than previously thought." (author's abstract)
%C DEU
%C Mannheim
%G en
%9 Vortrag
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info