Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorShankar, Bhavanide
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Richardde
dc.contributor.authorMorse, Stevede
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-01T03:26:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-30T04:48:29Z
dc.date.available2012-08-30T04:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/23998
dc.description.abstractTechnology involving genetic modification of crops has the potential to make a contribution to rural poverty reduction in many developing countries. Thus far, pesticide-producing ‘Bt’ varieties of cotton have been the main GM crops under cultivation in developing nations. Several studies have evaluated the farm-level performance of Bt varieties in comparison to conventional ones by estimating production technology, and have mostly found Bt technology to be very successful in raising output and/or reducing pesticide input. However, the production risk properties of this technology have not been studied, although they are likely to be important to risk-averse smallholders. This study investigates the output risk aspects of Bt technology by estimating two ‘flexible risk’ production function models allowing technology to independently affect the mean and higher moments of output. The first is the popular Just-Pope model and the second is a more general ‘damage control’ flexible risk model. The models are applied to cross-sectional data on South African smallholders, some of whom used Bt varieties. The results show no evidence that a ‘risk-reduction’ claim can be made for Bt technology. Indeed, there is some evidence to support the notion that the technology increases output risk, implying that simple (expected) profit computations used in past evaluations may overstate true benefits.en
dc.languageende
dc.titleProduction Risk, Pesticide Use and GM Crop Technology in South Africaen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalApplied Economicsde
dc.source.volume40de
dc.source.issue19de
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-239980de
dc.date.modified2011-04-01T03:26:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status-1de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo2489-2500
internal.identifier.journal21de
internal.identifier.document32
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600970161de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record