Endnote export

 

%T Developing a quality assurance metric
%A Love, Steve
%A Scoble, Rosa
%J Active Learning in Higher Education
%N 2
%P 129-141
%V 7
%D 2006
%K module evaluation methods; panoptic view; student feedback;
%= 2011-03-01T06:42:00Z
%~ http://www.peerproject.eu/
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-231188
%X There are a variety of techniques that lecturers can use to get feedback on their                teaching - for example, module feedback and coursework results. However, a question                arises about how reliable and valid are the content that goes into these quality                assurance metrics. The aim of this article is to present a new approach for                collecting and analysing qualitative feedback from students that could be used as                the first stage in developing more reliable quality assurance metrics. The approach,                known as the multi-dimensional crystal view, is based on the belief that individuals                have different views on the benefits that the embedded process in a system can have                on the behaviour of the system. The results of this study indicate that in the                context of evaluation and feedback methods, the multi-dimensional approach appears                to provide the opportunity for developing more effective student feedback mechanisms.
%G en
%9 journal article
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info