Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Übernahme per Copy & Paste
Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

       

Weiterempfehlen

Bookmark and Share


Is Compensation Enough? Relational Concerns in Responding to Unintended Inequity

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Okimoto, Tyler G.; Tyler, Tom R.

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-228341

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract Traditional justice models suggest that monetary compensation is an adequate response to unintended distributive harm. This perspective is widely accepted in real world settings, and is manifested in policies ranging from worker compensation to the court-based tort system. Drawing on the arguments from relational models of authority, we hypothesize that compensation for losses may be viewed by victims as an inadequate response to the situation, even when those losses are accidental and not the result of intentional harm. In four experimental studies, respondents were asked to react to the receipt of monetary compensation for accidental distributive inequities under varying degrees of relational concern. Results indicate that judgments about the favorability of compensation are only one aspect of people's reaction to responses to harm. In each case, victims displayed more favorable reactions toward the group when compensation was supplemented by relational concern.
Freie Schlagwörter accidental; compensation; distributive injustice; relational concern;
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2007
Seitenangabe S. 399-420
Zeitschriftentitel Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10 (2007) 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078701
Status Postprint; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)
top