Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Is Compensation Enough? Relational Concerns in Responding to Unintended Inequity

[journal article]

Okimoto, Tyler G.; Tyler, Tom R.

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(839 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-228341

Further Details
Abstract Traditional justice models suggest that monetary compensation is an adequate response to unintended distributive harm. This perspective is widely accepted in real world settings, and is manifested in policies ranging from worker compensation to the court-based tort system. Drawing on the arguments from relational models of authority, we hypothesize that compensation for losses may be viewed by victims as an inadequate response to the situation, even when those losses are accidental and not the result of intentional harm. In four experimental studies, respondents were asked to react to the receipt of monetary compensation for accidental distributive inequities under varying degrees of relational concern. Results indicate that judgments about the favorability of compensation are only one aspect of people's reaction to responses to harm. In each case, victims displayed more favorable reactions toward the group when compensation was supplemented by relational concern.
Free Keywords accidental; compensation; distributive injustice; relational concern;
Document language English
Publication Year 2007
Page/Pages p. 399-420
Journal Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10 (2007) 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078701
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)