Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

What Do We Think About Muslims? The Validity of Westerners' Implicit Theories About the Associations Between Muslims' Religiosity, Religious Identity, Aggression Potential, and Attitudes Toward Terrorism

[journal article]

Fischer, Peter; Greitemeyer, Tobias; Kastenmüller, Andreas

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-228322

Further Details
Abstract In a series of three studies, we investigated the validity of implicit theories that the German public holds regarding Muslims. German participants expected Muslims to be more aggressive than Christians, and therefore be more supportive of terrorism than Christians. Furthermore, Muslims were assumed to be more intrinsically religious and to hold a stronger identity with their religion than Christians (Study 1). However, self-assessment surveys of Muslims and Christians in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS: ex-Soviet Union) revealed that Muslims were not more aggressive, more intrinsically religious, or more supportive of terrorism than Christians. In contrast, Muslims reported a stronger religious identification than Christians (Study 2). Correspondingly, threat to religious identity was found to affect only Muslims', but not Christians', attitudes toward terrorism conducted by outgroup perpetrators. In contrast to Germans' implicit theories regarding Muslims, it was the importance of religious identity and not increased aggression potential that mediated this effect (Study 3).
Keywords aggression
Free Keywords Christians; Muslims; religious identification; terrorism;
Document language English
Publication Year 2007
Page/Pages p. 373-382
Journal Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10 (2007) 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078697
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)