Endnote export

 

%T Social Compensation: Fact or Social-Comparison Artifact?
%A Todd, Andrew R.
%A Seok, Dong-Heon
%A Kerr, Norbert L.
%A Messé, Lawrence A.
%J Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
%N 3
%P 431-442
%V 9
%D 2006
%K group performance; motivation gains; social compensation; social loafing;
%= 2011-03-01T05:47:00Z
%~ http://www.peerproject.eu/
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-227994
%X The use of coactors as non-group controls in prior social compensation research has                left open the possibility that the effect might artifactually have resulted from a                confound between work condition (Coaction vs. Collective) and the opportunity to                make performance comparisons. A direct empirical test of this alternative,                artifactual explanation is reported. Its results contradict that explanation and                suggest that the use of coactors as controls has, if anything, resulted in an                underestimation of the magnitude of the social compensation effect. It is argued                that multiple alternative non-group performance baselines can be informative for                analyzing group motivation effects.
%G en
%9 journal article
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info