Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Übernahme per Copy & Paste
Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

       

Weiterempfehlen

Bookmark and Share


Contemporary art's audiences : specialist accreditation and the myth of inclusion

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Sifakakis, Spyros

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-227182

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract While postmodernist claims for contemporary art's pluralism, inclusive character and interpenetration with everyday cultures proliferate, little attention is paid to the actual practices, discourses and realities of the art world, its institutions and the interest groups that are involved. Based on findings of the author's recent ethnographic research on a leading contemporary art gallery in Britain and through an analysis of art's audiences as an insider construct, this article argues that a distinction exists between informed and uninformed audiences which is directly associated with two competing types of cultural recognition. These are specialist accreditation and public recognition; the domination of the former in their struggle is presented as decisive in art's socio-cultural legitimization and as manifest in the content and limited range of the audience as an insider discourse.
Thesaurusschlagwörter Great Britain; art; present; audience; discourse; postmodernism; art criticism; reception; social recognition; expert; layperson
Klassifikation Kultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologie
Freie Schlagwörter art galleries; audiences; contemporary art; discourse; institutionalized artistic production; legitimacy; postmodernism; public recognition; specialist accreditation;
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2007
Seitenangabe S. 203-223
Zeitschriftentitel European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10 (2007) 2
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075908
Status Postprint; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)
top