Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Social identities and risk: expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use

[journal article]

Blok, Anders; Jensen, Mette; Kaltoft, Pernille

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(163 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224283

Further Details
Abstract Expert-based environmental and health risk regulation is widely believed to suffer from a lack of public understanding and legitimacy. On controversial issues such as genetically modified organisms and food-related chemicals, a “lay—expert discrepancy” in the assessment of risks is clearly visible. In this article, we analyze the relationship between scientific experts and ordinary lay citizens in the context of risks from pesticide usage in Denmark. Drawing on concepts from the “sociology of scientific knowledge” (SSK), we contend that differences in risk perception must be understood at the level of social identities. On the basis of qualitative interviews with citizens and experts, respectively, we focus on the multiple ways in which identities come to be employed in actors' risk accounts. Empirically, we identify salient characteristics of “typical” imagined experts and lay-people, while arguing that these conceptions vary identifiably in-between four groups of citizens and experts. On the basis of our findings, some implications for bridging the lay—expert discrepancy on risk issues are sketched out.
Document language English
Publication Year 2008
Page/Pages p. 189-209
Journal Public Understanding of Science, 17 (2008) 2
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070176
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)