Bibtex export

 

@article{ Mwale2006,
 title = {Societal deliberation on genetically modified maize in southern Africa: the                debateness and publicness of the Zambian national consultation on genetically                modified maize food aid in 2002},
 author = {Mwale, Pascal Newbourne},
 journal = {Public Understanding of Science},
 number = {1},
 pages = {89-102},
 volume = {15},
 year = {2006},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506058386},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-223992},
 abstract = {In the 2001/2002 farming season, southern Africa faced acute hunger. According to UN                WFP/FAO statistics, about 14 million people were on the verge of death by starvation                in the region. In Zambia alone, the UN WFP/FAO estimated that about 3 million people                were threatened with serious food shortages, and they would need about 630 000                metric tons of food. The UN WFP offered genetically modified (GM) maize grain,                procured from the US, to various countries in the region, including Zambia. A                significant debate emerged around the question of US-produced GM maize grain in the                region. This regional debate around the question of GM maize was most probably                aroused by the issues raised by the Zambian case. The form of this debate and the                issues driving its dynamics, are interesting both in themselves and also because                they reveal something about the form by which public biotechnological debate, or                public controversy on biotechnology, takes in public domains. This paper is an                experimental intellectual exercise, an attempt at a conceptual analysis of                “public debate” as a derivative, but quintessential, concept                within what is broadly conceived of as public understanding of science. Thus, this                conceptual analysis is an attempt at a prolegomena for, i.e. a preparatory                conceptual approach to, our understanding better what public debate on science is                and how it works in practice.},
}