Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops

[journal article]

Rowe, Gene; Horlick-Jones, Tom; Walls, John; Pidgeon, Nick

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(112 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-223864

Further Details
Abstract In the realm of risk management, and policy-making more generally, “public engagement” is often advocated as an antidote to pathologies associated with traditional methods of policy-making, and associated deficit-model-driven communication strategies. The actual benefits of public engagement are, however, difficult to establish without thorough evaluation of specific engagement processes. Unfortunately, rigorous evaluation is difficult, and, perhaps for this reason, it has rarely been undertaken. In this paper we highlight a number of these difficulties in the light of our experiences in evaluating a major engagement initiative, namely the GM Nation? publice debate on the possible commercialization of transgenic crops, which took place in Britain in 2003. The difficulties we identify seem likely to be relevant to many, if not most, engagement evaluations. They are concerned with both theoretical/normative (how one should evaluate) and practical (how one does evaluate) issues. We suggest a number of possible solutions to these evaluation difficulties.
Document language English
Publication Year 2005
Page/Pages p. 331-352
Journal Public Understanding of Science, 14 (2005) 4
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662505056611
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)