Bibtex export

 

@article{ Rudge2005,
 title = {Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence},
 author = {Rudge, David Wÿss},
 journal = {Public Understanding of Science},
 number = {3},
 pages = {249-268},
 volume = {14},
 year = {2005},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505052890},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-223831},
 abstract = {H.B.D. Kettlewell is famous for several investigations conducted in the early 1950s                on the phenomenon of industrial melanism, which are widely regarded as the classic                demonstration of natural selection. In a recent (2002) book-length popularization of                this episode in the history of the science, science writer Judith Hooper draws                attention to what she interprets as discrepancies in the results reported by                Kettlewell in his first scientific papers on the subject. On the basis of                correspondence among Kettlewell and his associates, a survey of scientific                publications that mention outstanding questions surrounding the phenomenon, as well                as interviews with his son, surviving colleagues, and scientists who have worked on                industrial melanism, Hooper all but explicitly concludes that Kettlewell committed                fraud. The following essay critically examines her evidence in support of this                allegation, including her discussion of his character, the alleged motives, and                whether fraud was even committed. None of Hooper’s arguments is found to                withstand careful scrutiny. The concluding section draws several conclusions about                how history of science should be depicted to the public.},
}