Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Übernahme per Copy & Paste
Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

       

Weiterempfehlen

Bookmark and Share


Globalization and deregulation: does flexicuritiy protect atypically employed?

Globalisierung und Deregulierung: werden atypisch Beschäftigte durch Flexicurity geschützt?
[Arbeitspapier]

Seifert, Hartmut; Tangian, Andranik S.

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-219339

Weitere Angaben:
Körperschaftlicher Herausgeber Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut in der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung
Abstract "Hitherto, discussion of flexicurity has focused on normal employment (permanent full-time), with atypical work receiving only cursory attention. Nevertheless, the most affected are just atypically employed (= other than normally employed). To monitor effects of flexicurity policies in Europe, flexicurity indices are constructed from: (a) scores of the strictness of employment protection legislation provided by the OECD, (b) qualitative juridical data on social security benefits (unemployment insurance, public pensions, etc.), and (c) data on the dynamics of employment types (permanent, temporary, full-time, part-time, self-employed, etc.). The empirical investigation shows that, contrary to political promises and theoretical opinions, the deregulation of European labour markets absolutely predominates. Its moderate compensation by advantages in social security occurred only twice: in Denmark and Netherlands at the end of the 1990s. The flexibilization reduces the average employment status, i.e. employees are more often employed not permanently but temporarily, not full-time but part-time, and more frequently they involuntary turn to self-employment. On the other hand, the eligibility to social benefits depends on the employment status. Thereby these trends disqualify employees from social benefits. The apparent compensation of the labour market deregulation by social advantages is therefore insufficient." (author's abstract)
Thesaurusschlagwörter type of employment; flexibility; flexicurity; globalization; deregulation; job security; social security; Europe; EU; labor market; labor; job
Klassifikation Industrie- und Betriebssoziologie, Arbeitssoziologie, industrielle Beziehungen; soziale Sicherung; Arbeitsmarktpolitik
Methode empirisch
Freie Schlagwörter labour market flexibility; atypical employment; social security; composite indicators
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2006
Erscheinungsort Düsseldorf
Seitenangabe 22 S.
Schriftenreihe WSI-Diskussionspapier, 143
Lizenz Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung
Datenlieferant Dieser Metadatensatz wurde vom Sondersammelgebiet Sozialwissenschaften (USB Köln) erstellt.
top