SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(619.6Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-209191

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

A randomised controlled trial of a school-based intervention to prevent tobacco use among children and adolescents in Italy

Eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie einer schulischen Intervention zur Verhinderung des Tabakkonsums bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Italien
[journal article]

La Torre, Giuseppe
Chiaradia, Giacomina
Monte, Lea
Moretti, Claudia
Mannocci, Alice
Capitanio, Daniele
Ferrara, Maria
Gentile, Adele
Di Thiene, Domitilla
Vito, Elisabetta
Boccia, Antonio

Abstract

Aim: A randomised field trial was conducted to evaluate a school-based programme to prevent tobacco use in children and adolescents. Subject and methods: The trial included 534 children and 308 adolescents who were randomly selected to receive or not to receive the prevention programme. The preventi... view more

Aim: A randomised field trial was conducted to evaluate a school-based programme to prevent tobacco use in children and adolescents. Subject and methods: The trial included 534 children and 308 adolescents who were randomly selected to receive or not to receive the prevention programme. The prevention programme included: (a) health facts and the effect of smoking, (b) analysis of the mechanisms underlying intiation of smoking and (c) refusal skills training to deal with the social pressures to smoke. A questionnaire was administered before the intervention programme and 2 years later. Results: The prevalence rates of smoking in both groups of children and adolescents were increased at the end of the study. Anyway, the difference of smoking prevalence between the intervention and control groups was statistically significant only for the children’s group (from 18.3 to 18.8% for the intervention group and from 17.8 to 26.9% in the control group) (p = 0.035). As regards reasons that induced the start of smoking, there was a significant increase of the issue "because smokers are fools" (p = 0.004 for children; p < 0.001 for adolescents) and "because smokers are irresponsible" (p ≤ 0.001 for both children and adolescents) in the experimental groups. Conclusion: The results suggest that a school-based intervention programme addressing tobacco use among children and adolescents, based on the development of cognitive and behavioural aspects, can be effective. After 1 year of intervention, smoking prevalence was significantly lower in children belonging to the intervention group than in children not randomised to intervention. Targeting young children before they begin to smoke can be a successful way of prevention.... view less

Keywords
attitude change; Italy; tobacco consumption; behavior modification; pupil; prevention; health consequences; health policy; cognitive factors; knowledge; adolescent; comparison; child; program

Classification
Medical Sociology
Health Policy

Method
applied research; empirical; quantitative empirical

Free Keywords
Tobacco; Smoking; School-based; Prevention programme

Document language
English

Publication Year
2010

Page/Pages
p. 533-542

Journal
Journal of Public Health, 18 (2010) 6

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0328-8

Status
Postprint; peer reviewed

Licence
PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.