Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Übernahme per Copy & Paste
Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

       

Weiterempfehlen

Bookmark and Share


The movement strategy in Taiwan's judicial independence reform

Die Bewegungsstrategie in Taiwans Justizreformprozess
[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Wang, Chin-shou

fulltextDownloadVolltext herunterladen

(externe Quelle)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-3053

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract Judicial independence reform in Taiwan was pioneered by a group of reform-spirited judges from Room 303 of the Taichung (Taizhong) District Court, in 1993. Rather than joining the mass movement that was unfolding on the streets, the reformers formed a coalition with other judges to trigger reform from within the judiciary. The reformers appealed to the rule of law and democracy as a movement strategy for mobilization. As a result, the movement strategy turned out to be a great success, and Room 303 became the chief engine for further judicial reforms in subsequent years. However, the movement strategy in itself also presents some limitations. This paper examines why the movement strategy was successful and how its limitations eventually created problems that hinder further judicial reforms in Taiwan.
Thesaurusschlagwörter Taiwan; judiciary; reform; judge; social movement; success; mobilization; jurisdiction; legal proceedings; democratization; historical analysis; Asia
Klassifikation Kriminalsoziologie, Rechtssoziologie, Kriminologie; allgemeine Geschichte; Justiz
Methode deskriptive Studie; historisch
Freie Schlagwörter Political science; judicial politics; judicial assistance; social/ political movements; rule of law; democracy; judicial independence reform; movement strategy; contempoary
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2010
Seitenangabe S. 125-147
Zeitschriftentitel Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39 (2010) 3
ISSN 1868-4874
Status Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung
top