Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Student-oriented vesus teacher-centred: the effect of learning at workstations about birds and bird flight on cognitive achievement and motivation

[journal article]

Sturm, Heike; Bogner, Franz X.

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(398 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-132355

Further Details
Abstract The study investigated cognitive and motivational effects of two educational interventions, a conventional versus a student-oriented approach. We monitored the impact on the cognitive achievement outcome and the motivation of students. Both approaches dealt with the subject of birds and bird flight; the student-oriented approach consisted of a unit based on workstations, the conventional one was taught in a more teacher-centred manner. 326 secondary school pupils of the highest stratification level participated in this study. By using a pre-, post- and retention-test design, both approaches were evaluated with the same empirical batteries (by applying a cognitive item set and the 'Intrinsic Motivation Inventory'). The conventional approach provided higher achievement scores whereas the student-oriented approach showed a higher motivational rating. Comparing the student-oriented approach with and without introduction, the group with introduction attained higher achievement scores. The results are discussed in terms of general expectations about the cognitive outcome in open learning environments and self-determination theory. Educational implications are drawn concerning the implementation of learning at workstations in school curricula.
Classification Curriculum, Teaching, Didactics; Teachers, Students, Pupils; General Psychology
Free Keywords biology education; learning environment; learning at workstations; student-oriented; teacher-centred
Document language English
Publication Year 2008
Page/Pages p. 941-959
Journal International Journal of Science Education, 30 (2008) 7
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690701313995
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)