More documents from Boschert, Karin; Gill, Bernhard
More documents from Science and Public Policy

Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Germany's agri-biotechnology policy: precaution for choice and alternatives

Deutschlands Agrarbiotechnologiepolitik: Schutzmaßnahmen für Wahlmöglichkeiten und Alternativen
[journal article]

Boschert, Karin; Gill, Bernhard

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:

Further Details
Abstract In Germany, the precautionary principle (PP) is a well-established legal principle in environmental law, especially for regulating agribiotechnology. This article uses the analytical concept of issue-framing to identify different views of the PP and how they have informed changes in the German regulatory arena. In the 1990s Germany's genetically modified (GM) crop policy was dominated by a discourse of innovation and international competitiveness, combined with narrow accounts of precaution. In the early 2000s, agro-biotechnology became subject to changes in the risk regulatory system, new agricultural policies and a broader precautionary scope. After the BSE crisis, German policy promoted sustainable agriculture and organic food, combined with the demand for a precautionary consumer policy and 'consumer choice'. Precaution now encompasses comprehensive mandatory labelling and liability rules to protect non-GM food production from GM 'contamination' in fields and across the food chain.
Keywords biotechnology; environmental policy; agricultural policy; Federal Republic of Germany; environmental law; agriculture; regulation; political governance; modification; risk; consumer protection; agricultural product; alternative
Classification Special areas of Departmental Policy; Ecology, Environment
Method descriptive study
Free Keywords Agri-biotechnology policy; biotechnology; precaution; precautionary principle; labelling; liability; contamination; GM
Document language English
Publication Year 2005
Page/Pages p. 285-292
Journal Science and Public Policy, 32 (2005) 4
Status Published Version; reviewed
Licence Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works