Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Übernahme per Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Germany's agri-biotechnology policy: precaution for choice and alternatives

Deutschlands Agrarbiotechnologiepolitik: Schutzmaßnahmen für Wahlmöglichkeiten und Alternativen

Boschert, Karin; Gill, Bernhard


Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-10919

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract In Germany, the precautionary principle (PP) is a well-established legal principle in environmental law, especially for regulating agribiotechnology. This article uses the analytical concept of issue-framing to identify different views of the PP and how they have informed changes in the German regulatory arena. In the 1990s Germany's genetically modified (GM) crop policy was dominated by a discourse of innovation and international competitiveness, combined with narrow accounts of precaution. In the early 2000s, agro-biotechnology became subject to changes in the risk regulatory system, new agricultural policies and a broader precautionary scope. After the BSE crisis, German policy promoted sustainable agriculture and organic food, combined with the demand for a precautionary consumer policy and 'consumer choice'. Precaution now encompasses comprehensive mandatory labelling and liability rules to protect non-GM food production from GM 'contamination' in fields and across the food chain.
Thesaurusschlagwörter biotechnology; environmental policy; agricultural policy; Federal Republic of Germany; environmental law; agriculture; regulation; political governance; modification; risk; consumer protection; agricultural product; alternative
Klassifikation spezielle Ressortpolitik; Ökologie und Umwelt
Methode deskriptive Studie
Freie Schlagwörter Agri-biotechnology policy; biotechnology; precaution; precautionary principle; labelling; liability; contamination; GM
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2005
Seitenangabe S. 285-292
Zeitschriftentitel Science and Public Policy, 32 (2005) 4
Status Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet
Lizenz Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung