SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(externe Quelle)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10548

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies

[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Tamakoshi, Mio
Zagel, Hannah

Abstract

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional fra... mehr

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional framework to capture how policies can shape different sets of inequalities and how access to reproductive care is provided. The two dimensions that compose our framework are "permissiveness," the degree to which government policies enable access to reproductive care by legalizing services, defining who qualifies as a patient, and/or imposing restrictive measures on service delivery, and "generosity," the extent to which government policies subsidize the costs of authorized services for individuals deemed eligible. We applied the permissiveness-generosity framework to quantitative data on MAR and abortion policies from 2020 from the International Reproduction Policy Database across 30 high‐income countries. We then investigated the cases of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, which group together in the overall plotting, more in‐depth. The quantitative mapping revealed diverse approaches to reproductive equity, with some countries having both permissive and generous policies, while others focus on one dimension or provide limited support altogether. The case studies show that despite overall trends towards greater reproductive equity in recent decades, state support for individuals' equal access to MAR and abortion remains limited and has taken different pathways in this group of countries. This study contributes to a better understanding of how state policies promote equal access to reproductive care and enable individuals to pursue their desired reproductive pathways, regardless of their characteristics or socioeconomic position.... weniger

Thesaurusschlagwörter
Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Österreich; Schweiz; Schwangerschaftsabbruch; Wohlfahrtsstaat; Reproduktionsmedizin; Gleichberechtigung; medizinische Versorgung

Klassifikation
Medizinsoziologie

Freie Schlagwörter
medically assisted reproduction; reproductive equity; stratified reproduction

Sprache Dokument
Englisch

Publikationsjahr
2025

Zeitschriftentitel
Social Inclusion, 13 (2025)

Heftthema
Contemporary Changes in Medically Assisted Reproduction: The Role of Social Inequality and Social Norms

ISSN
2183-2803

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.